Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont has vetoed a wide-ranging affordable housing bill that aimed to push towns to build more housing, zone for duplexes and townhomes, and ease parking requirements near transit. The move halts a long-debated legislative push backed by housing advocates, lawmakers, and planners to address the state’s chronic housing shortage.

Read: Landlord Groups Block California Bill Extending Rent Deadline to 14 Days

Lamont Halts Housing Push

Governor Ned Lamont vetoed the omnibus housing bill on Monday, despite its passage in the state Senate on May 30 and strong support from legislative housing committees. The bill combined several long-proposed reforms and sought to expand affordable housing options statewide. Lamont justified his decision by pointing to a lack of local official support and concerns over regulatory burdens, saying, “A veto doesn’t mean dead stop. A veto means we can do a lot better, and I hope we can do that.”

Also read: Two Advocates Detained After Vermont Passes Law of Housing Access for Immigrants

Backlash From Advocates

Housing advocates expressed disappointment at the veto, accusing opponents of misrepresenting the bill’s content. “Every element of the bill was backed by empirical research, expert and non-expert supportive testimony, and common sense,” wrote Desegregate CT and the Regional Plan Association. They argued the bill neither forced towns to build nor punished them for noncompliance. Opponents claimed it undermined local control and bundled too many complex proposals.

Also read: Eight Dallas Lawyers Defend Tenants in 600+ Eviction Cases Monthly

Affordable Housing Mandates

A central provision of the bill would have required towns to zone for at least a quarter of their “fair share” allocation, an amount based on wealth, affordability, and housing production metrics. Wealthier towns would have been expected to plan for more units. While the bill offered funding incentives, it did not impose penalties or legal risks for failing to meet targets. The proposal, led by the Open Communities Alliance, marked the culmination of five years of advocacy.

Also read: SF Board of Appeals Allows Demolition of Rental Housing, Setting Dangerous Precedent

Focus on Transit Hubs

The bill included incentives for towns to create “transit-oriented districts” by zoning for middle housing, such as duplexes and townhomes, near transit stops. The initiative, branded “Work Live Ride,” was championed by Desegregate CT and allowed towns to opt in voluntarily. Advocates said connecting housing to transit could help lower living costs and reduce emissions. While the bill faced pushback from small towns fearing a loss of zoning control, its backers plan to revisit the idea in future sessions.

Also read: Tenant Screening Industry Faces Scrutiny Over Errors, Discrimination Against Renters

Controversy Over Zoning Reforms

Another controversial part of the bill would have required towns to allow middle housing in commercial zones without needing individual permits or hearings. Critics saw this as bypassing public input and local authority. Supporters like Sean Ghio from the Partnership for Strong Communities argued that housing policy should be regional, not hyper-local. The bill also proposed incentives for creating “priority housing development zones” with streamlined approvals for multifamily projects.

Also read: Michigan Senate Considers Bill to Cap Rental Application Fees at $25

Lamont’s Own Proposal Included

Governor Lamont had introduced the concept of priority housing zones at the start of the session, where pre-approved multifamily developments would face fewer legal hurdles. His office had noted that this would encourage private investment in housing while maintaining local input under a “simple and predictable” system. The bill also aimed to simplify legal proceedings for towns participating in the program by temporarily waiving the burden of justifying rejections of affordable housing proposals in court.

Next up:

California Governor Newsom Threatens to Reject California Budget Without Housing Bill

Bellingham City Votes to Eliminate ‘Junk Fees’ for Tenants

Tennessee’s Anti-Harboring Immigrants Law Faces Challenge Over Constitutionality

Safety Fears Grow as Westwood Mobile Home Tenants Protest Fence Removal